Repetitive
Motion
Introduction/Background
OSHA Standard(s)
Hazard
Prevention & Control
FAQs
Links Introduction
Repetitive motion injuries
resulted in the longest absences from work among the leading
events and exposures in 2001 (median of 18 days away from
work). Source.
Repetitive motion injuries
occur as a result of performing the same motion over and over
again, day after day and year after year, and are common in
the pork production industry. Workers in large sow complexes
may wind up processing several hundred pigs in one day. As
a result of repeating the same physical motion, workers are
at risk of developing a repetitive motion injury. How a worker
uses his or her body to perform a certain task can increase
or decrease the likelihood of a repetitive motion injury.
Work-Related Musculoskeletal
Disorders (MSDs) are musculoskeletal disorders caused or made
worse by the work environment. Work MSDs can cause severe
and debilitating symptoms such as pain, numbness, and tingling;
reduced worker productivity; lost time from work; temporary
or permanent disability; inability to perform job tasks; and
an increase in workers compensation costs.
[the
following 3 paragraphs from Langley.htm. . . ] An epidemic
of repetitive motion disorders is occurring in general industry.
Possible causes include increased demands for production,
out-of-shape workers, inadequate education on prevention of
injuries, as well as poor tool design. Workers in swine industries
frequently report similar problems.
Sources of injury in swine
workers include lifting or moving swine, handling feed, and
while vaccinating or bleeding swine. Improper lifting, bending
or stooping frequently strains the muscles in the back. Occasionally
the back pain may be so severe that the worker experiences
lost work time. The workers should be adequately educated
on proper lifting techniques, i.e., lifting at the knees without
twisting while keeping the load close to the body. The use
of back belts is controversial. Job rotation may be another
option that allows muscles time to recover from overuse.
Frequent injections or bleeding
of swine is associated with complaints of wrist or arm pain.
If recovery time between these activities is insufficient
and forceful, awkward postures are involved, then the risk
for developing a repetitive motion disorder is high. Conditions
such as tendonitis, tenosynovitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome
may occur. To prevent these injuries from occurring, the worker
should try to alternate hands and maintain their wrist in
neutral positions. Knee pads will help decrease pressure on
the knees. Hand stretching exercises may also be useful. There
is a need for a multiple injection needle which can be reused
and requires little force to work the equipment effectively.
OSHA Standard(s)
The Occupational Safety and
Health Act (OSH Act) requires employers to comply with hazard-specific
safety and health standards. In addition, pursuant to Section
5(a)(1) of the OSH Act, often referred to as the General
Duty Clause, employers must provide their employees
with a workplace free from recognized hazards likely to cause
death or serious physical harm, including ergonomic hazards.
OSHA will cite for ergonomic hazards under the General Duty
Clause or issue ergonomic hazard letters where appropriate
as part of its overall enforcement program.
Hazard
Repetitive, forceful, or prolonged exertions of the hands;
frequent or heavy lifting, pushing, pulling, or carrying of
heavy objects; prolonged awkward postures; and vibration contribute
to work-related musculoskeletal problems. Working conditions
that combine risk factors will increase the risk for musculoskeletal
problems. The level of risk depends on how long a worker is
exposed to these conditions, how often they are exposed, and
the level of exposure. Repetitive motion injuries are most
commonly caused by work done during the processing stage of
pork production. These tasks include clipping teeth, giving
shots or cutting tails. A repetitive motion injury exposure
is determined by the way you use your body when completing
these tasks.
The most common repetitive motion injury is
carpel tunnel syndrome, a disorder that occurs
when a nerve that runs from the forearm into the hand becomes
pressed or squeezed at the wrist. Carpal tunnel is characterized
by discomfort and weakness in the hand. A person may have
symptoms in one or both hands. Among the symptoms a worker
may first notice in the hand he or she uses the most are:
- Numbness or tingling in the hand and fingers
(thumb, index and middle finger).
- Pain in the wrist, palm or forearm.
- More numbness or pain at night than during
the day.
- More pain as the hand or wrist is used.
- Trouble gripping objects.
- Weakness in the thumb.
If an employee has symptoms of carpal tunnel
syndrome they should see a doctor to receive treatment for
the illness.
Prevention
& Control
Musculoskeletal disorders are often confused with ergonomics.
Ergonomics is the science of fitting workplace conditions
and job demands to the capabilities of workers. In other words,
musculoskeletal disorders are the problem and ergonomics is
a solution [source].
Training
Advise your employees on avoiding improper ways to use their
body:
- twisting their body when carrying animals
or other heavy objects
- continuously bending or twisting their
wrists
- working from an awkward position
- reaching above shoulder level again and
again
- using hands to push, pound or in some manner
exert strong force
- gripping tools that dig into their palm
Administrative
Encourage your employees to follow these guidelines to decrease
their chances of suffering a repetitive motion injury:
- Allow short “stretch” breaks
when employees are repeatedly performing the same task.
- Rotate assigned tasks performed during
the day.
- cross-train employees to multiple tasks
and encourage or schedule job/task switching
Engineering
Redesign the job/task;
- Redesign or purchase tools [such
as what? I was thing of vaccination equipment and tail cutting/castration
tools. Do they come in sizes? Or geared so that only light
pressure is needed to make the thing shut/cut/shoot?] that
fit employee’s hands [e.g. women and other smaller
employees], weigh less, and have a minimum of vibration;
- If possible, adjust working heights or
surfaces to help employees maintain proper posture
Reduce the Risk of Developing Carpal
Tunnel Syndrome
- Physically altering how the repetitive
activity is performed (such as by changing hands)
- Keeping the wrist in a neutral position,
if possible.
- Gently stretching hands and fingers during
short breaks can also help.
FAQs
Q: What is an "ergonomic
injury"?
Q: Are all MSDs work-related?
Q: How do you determine whether MSDs are work-related?
Q: Why aren't you doing another rule?
Q: How do you expect OSHA's guidelines to reduce
injuries and illnesses related to MSDs?
Q: What is a guideline and how does it differ
from a standard?
Q: What if I am an employer in an industry for
which OSHA does not develop industry-specific guidelines?
Q: What industries will these guidelines cover? [you
get the idea. I didn't anchor/link everything.--ms]
Q: Will the guidelines cover agriculture, construction and
maritime?
Q: Will OSHA notify employers who have high rates of MSDs?
Q: What will the OSHA enforcement program entail?
Q: What if I am an employer in an industry for which OSHA
does not develop industry-specific guidelines?
Q: Does this mean OSHA will not use the General Duty Clause
to cite for ergonomic hazards?
Q: Will OSHA use the new guidelines as a basis for enforcement?
Q: Will the guidelines cover agriculture?
Q: What is an "ergonomic
injury"?
A: Input from the recent ergonomics forums demonstrated to
OSHA that there are a wide variety of opinions on how the
Agency should define an ergonomic injury and that the definition
adopted by OSHA depends on the context. Ergonomic injuries
are often described by the term "musculoskeletal disorders
(MSD)." This is the term of art in scientific literature
that refers collectively to a group of injuries and illnesses
that affect the musculoskeletal system; there is no single
diagnosis for MSDs. As OSHA develops guidance material for
specific industries, the agency may narrow the definition
as appropriate to address the specific workplace hazards covered.
OSHA will work closely with stakeholders to develop definitions
for MSDs as part of its overall effort to develop guidance
materials.
Q: Are all MSDs work-related?
A: No. MSDs can and do develop outside the workplace.
Q: How do you determine whether
MSDs are work-related?
A: The determination of whether any particular MSD is work-related
may require the use of different approaches tailored to specific
workplace conditions and exposures. Broadly speaking, establishing
the work-relatedness of a specific case may include:
-- taking a careful history of the patient and the illness;
-- conducting a thorough medical examination; and
-- characterizing factors on and off the job that may have
caused or contributed to the MSD.
Q: Why aren't you doing another
rule?
A: Congress passed, and the President signed, Senate Joint
Resolution 6, which rescinded the original ergonomics rule,
and under the Congressional Review Act, prohibits the agency
from issuing a rule that is substantially the same as the
former one.
There are a number of reasons why guidelines
are preferable to doing a rule. OSHA must follow certain criteria
in doing a rule - any rule. In terms of ergonomics, there
are factors that make doing a rule very difficult:
• There are a variety of different hazards and combinations
of different hazards to be addressed;
• Exposure to the hazards is not readily measured in
some cases;
• The exposure-response relationship is not well understood;
• Cost and feasibility of abatement measures may be
uncertain and may be very high in some cases; and
• It is very difficult, except in the most general terms,
to prescribe remedies for abating such hazards in a single
rule.
These considerations make it very difficult to develop simple
criteria for compliance that can apply to a broad range of
industries.
On the other hand, industry
and task specific guidelines can be developed more quickly
and are more flexible, and can provide specific and helpful
guidance for abatement to assist employees and employers in
minimizing injuries. Guidelines are the most effective method
available for reducing injuries quickly.
Q: How do you expect OSHA's
guidelines to reduce injuries and illnesses related to MSDs?
A: Injuries and illnesses related to MSDs have consistently
declined over the last 10 years, even though there has not
been a standard addressing them. Guidelines, such as OSHA's
Meatpacking Guidelines, and voluntary industry efforts have
been successful in reducing the injury and illness rates for
these disorders. For example, on a national basis, rates for
carpal tunnel injuries with days away from work have gone
down by 39 percent from 1992 to 1999. For the same time period,
rates for strains and sprains with days away from work have
also gone down by 39 percent, and rates for back injuries
with days away from work have gone down by 45 percent. In
the meatpacking industry, with industry-specific guidelines
and focused OSHA enforcement, rates of carpal tunnel injuries
with days away from work have gone down 47 percent from 1992
to 1999. Over the same time period, rates of strains and sprains
with days away from work have gone down by 61 percent, and
rates for back injuries with days away from work have gone
down by 64 percent. OSHA expects that industry-or-task-specific
guidelines will further reduce injuries and illnesses as they
are completed and implemented. OSHA's VPP (Voluntary Protection
Program) participants, who have implemented safety and health
programs, have injury and illness rates 53 percent below the
average for their respective SIC codes.
Q: What is a guideline and
how does it differ from a standard?
A: A guideline is a tool to assist employers in recognizing
and controlling hazards. It is voluntary. Failure to implement
a guideline is not itself a violation of the General Duty
Clause of the OSH Act. Guidelines that OSHA develops will
provide information to help employers identify ergonomic hazards
in their workplaces and implement feasible measures to control
those hazards.
Guidelines are more flexible than standards.
They can be developed quickly and can be changed easily as
new information becomes available with scientific advances.
Guidelines make it easier for employers to adopt innovative
programs to suit their workplaces, rather than inflexible,
one-size-fits-all solutions to issues that may be unique to
the industry or facility.
Q: What industries will these
guidelines cover?
A: OSHA will develop industry-or-task-specific guidelines
for a select number of industries, taking into account injury
and illness incidence rates as well as available information
on what is known to work. These guidelines will be developed
with input from others. As industry-or-task-specific guidelines
are drafted, we will make public announcements and share the
information as broadly as possible.
Q: Will the guidelines cover agriculture?
A: Guidelines offer the flexibility to go beyond general industry.
The previous administration's ergonomics standard was limited
in scope to general industry. In addition to the industry-specific
guidelines that OSHA plans to develop, the agency will encourage
other industries to develop their own guidelines to reduce
MSDs.
Q: Will OSHA use the new guidelines as a basis
for enforcement?
A: No. An employer's failure to implement the new guidelines
will not be a violation of the General Duty Clause of the
OSH Act. Rather, OSHA intends that the guidelines will provide
information to help employers identify ergonomic hazards in
their workplaces and implement feasible measures to control
such hazards. For this reason, OSHA anticipates that there
would likely be no basis for a Section 5(a)(1) citation for
employers with ergonomic hazards who effectively implement
the ergonomics guidelines or other appropriate measures. OSHA
will not be focusing its enforcement efforts on employers
who have implemented effective ergonomic programs or who are
making good-faith efforts to reduce ergonomic hazards.
Q: Does this mean OSHA will not use the General
Duty Clause to cite for ergonomic hazards?
A: OSHA will use the General Duty Clause to cite employers
for ergonomic hazards. Under the OSH Act's General Duty Clause,
employers must keep their workplaces free from recognized
serious hazards, including ergonomic hazards. This requirement
exists whether or not there are voluntary guidelines.
Q: What if I am an employer in an industry
for which OSHA does not develop industry-specific guidelines?
A: Even if there are no guidelines specific to your industry,
as an employer you still have an obligation under the General
Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1) to keep your workplace free from
recognized serious hazards, including ergonomic hazards. OSHA
will cite for ergonomic hazards under the General Duty Clause
or issue ergonomic hazard letters where appropriate as part
of its overall enforcement program. OSHA encourages employers
where necessary to implement effective programs or other measures
to reduce ergonomic hazards and associated MSDs. A great deal
of information is currently available from OSHA, NIOSH, and
various industry and labor organizations on how to establish
an effective ergonomics program, and OSHA urges employers
to avail themselves of these resources.
Q: What will the OSHA enforcement program
entail?
A: OSHA has been assessing MSD-related issues in complaints,
referrals, and targeted inspections. OSHA will continue to
evaluate the findings of its inspections and issue General
Duty Clause citations or hazard alert letters for ergonomics
hazards where appropriate. OSHA will do the same when responding
to worker complaints.
OSHA will conduct inspections for ergonomic
hazards and issue citations under the General Duty Clause
and issue ergonomic hazard alert letters where appropriate.
OSHA will conduct follow-up inspections or investigations
within 12 months of certain employers who receive ergonomic
hazard alert letters.
OSHA will initiate a National Emphasis Program
in the nursing home industry to guide inspections of nursing
homes, and to focus significant effort on addressing ergonomic
hazards related to patient lifting.
OSHA will conduct specialized training of
appropriate staff on ergonomic hazards and abatement methods
and designate 10 regional ergonomic coordinators and involve
them in enforcement and outreach.
Q: Will OSHA notify employers who have high
rates of MSDs?
A: Yes. As an adjunct to the Site Specific Targeting (SST),
OSHA annually notifies employers in the OSHA Data Initiative
who report high Lost Workday Injury and Illness rates at their
establishment(s), and recommends that they seek assistance
in addressing these workplace hazards. If employers report
high rates of injuries which in some cases may be related
to ergonomic issues, they will also be urged to seek assistance
to address those hazards.
LINKS
Occupational
Hazards on Swine Farms, Ricky Langley, Duke University
Ergonomics
for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders. Guidelines
for the Poultry Industry. Many of the concepts from this guideline
are adaptable to the swine industry, esp those related to
conducting a job hazard analysis, recordkeeping, and solutions.
1993
Ergonomics Program Management Guidelines for Meatpacking Plants,
NIOSH Publication No. 97-117: Elements
of Ergonomics Programs. A Primer Based on Workplace Evaluations
of Musculoskeletal Disorders. Not specific to swine production,
but concepts can be applied, for example, solutions related
to “lifting and bending in tending to infant needs”
can be applied to “lifting and bending in nursery and
feeding operations [this needs to make
sense, I made up the last part—ms]
CHECKLISTS for ergonomic
risk assessements
Ergonomic
Risk Factor Checklist (Labour Canada)
Ergonomics
Risk Factor Checklist (UC Davis)
General
Ergonomics Risk Analysis Checklist (CDC NIOSH)
Hazard
Zone Jobs Checklist (Washington State)
You will
need to download the Acrobat Reader to read pdf files if you
don't already have the reader. It's free.
|